The Mind Health Report, a collaboration between AXA and IPSOS, surveyed 19,000 adults across 18 countries between January 12 and February 16, 2026. It found that 68% are potentially affected by anxiety, stress or depression, with the figure rising to 85% among 18- to 24-year-olds. More than six in ten respondents report using AI-driven tools for mental health questions, while 45% express dissatisfaction with AI-provided answers. The study highlights that while AI offers 24/7 accessibility and low cost, many users worry about accuracy and reliability, and some trust AI platforms more than mental health professionals (38%). The findings also emphasize that screen time and technology use correlate with poorer mental health, and that a substantial portion of those struggling did not seek professional help in the past year due to cost or time barriers. Experts stress that AI should complement, not replace, professional care and that robust guardrails are essential to identify warning signs and escalate to clinicians when needed. The report calls for careful implementation of AI tools in mental health, with emphasis on safety, privacy, and appropriate use cases, especially for younger users.
Widespread adoption of AI for mental health questions is already evident, with a significant share of people relying on AI tools and some expressing higher trust in AI than professionals, signaling a shift in how people seek support.
Unchanged: Access to professional mental health care remains essential; AI is not a substitute, and many users still report dissatisfaction with AI guidance.
The tone mixes cautious optimism about AI-enabled access with strong safety and quality concerns
Widespread use and trust in AI are growing, but concerns about accuracy and safety temper enthusiasm
Mental health support tech adoption increases but requires safety, privacy, and clinical alignment
Sponsored Mind Health Report and survey on AI use in mental health
Partner in the Mind Health Report providing survey data
Example of AI tool mentioned as used for mental health questions
Mentioned as a platform used in AI-driven mental health queries
AXA head of health and prevention commenting on guardrails and safety
IPSOS executive discussing interpretation of survey findings
The findings underscore a growing reliance on AI for mental health support while revealing gaps in accuracy and trust. This has implications for healthcare delivery, digital health regulation, and the design of safer AI systems that can identify warning signs and escalate to professionals when needed.
Some gain accessible, 24/7 support; others face risks from potentially inaccurate guidance and overreliance
Organizations may integrate AI tools for support, but face liability and quality assurance considerations
Survey spans 18 countries; adoption and attitudes vary by region
Standard protections in consumer health apps apply
Cross-border health data handling and privacy concerns
Stakeholders emphasize safety and guardrails
Survey results reflect current adoption and views; implementation is feasible
Existing digital health platforms suffice for deployment
Global survey with cross-border data handling considerations
Regulatory guidance evolving for AI in health contexts
AI tools and platforms sourced from established providers
AI augments roles rather than fully replaces clinicians
Liability when AI guidance leads to harm or misdiagnosis