NewsBite analysis · Business, Regulation
9to5mac
Apple: DOJ’s latest challenge in antitrust case ‘fails at every level’
Apple is taking a firm stand against the Department of Justice's (DOJ) motion challenging a court decision that allowed the company to seek discovery from 14 US federal agencies as part of its defense in an ongoing antitrust case. The DOJ's motion claims that Apple’s requests are burdensome and irrelevant, as the agencies are not ordinary consumers. Apple's response categorically rejects the DOJ's arguments, stating they lack merit and that the special master had correctly applied the law. This legal maneuvering highlights the complexities of antitrust litigation and the significant stakes involved for Apple in proving its practices are justifiable.
MonitorConfidence: HighImmediate horizonRegulatory risk: High
Published 18 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC2 min read
Visit original article ↗Lead image — 9to5mac
Summary
TL;DR
- Apple secured the ability to seek documents from 14 US agencies.
- DOJ argues the discovery requests are burdensome and irrelevant.
- Apple's defense hinges on proving the legitimacy of its business practices.
- The DOJ's motion to overturn Apple's discovery win has been publicly refuted.
- Judge Linares will decide on the validity of the DOJ's request.
Interesting facts
- This case is part of a broader scrutiny of Apple's market practices.
- The use of a special master in such cases is increasingly common.
- Apple is relying on previous court cases to bolster its arguments.