Source profile
CIO
✓Enterprise technology publication focused on CIOs and IT leaders. Covers digital transformation, cloud, security, data, and enterprise strategy. Strong for decision-maker context and implementation lessons. Often includes case studies and leadership perspectives.
Official source: NoMainstream media: NoLast activity: 13h ago
20 items analyzedVisit site ↗
Insights Metrics v2
Metric board
Publisher typeWhether the publisher is an official company channel or a mainstream outlet. Best-effort editorial judgements, hand-set per source.
24h
independent
Sample: 2Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
7d
independent
Sample: 14Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
30d
independent
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Articles publishedThe number of final articles from this source whose event date falls in the window, with the change from the previous window. Counts what we collected; sources run on different schedules.
24h
2
Sample: 2Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
7d
14was 30
Not enough data for a change figure
Sample: 14Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
30d
94was 3
Not enough data for a change figure
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Active daysThe number of days in the window with at least one final article from this source. For sources that rarely expose a publish date, this is based on collection date.
24h
- Active days
- 1
- Dated share
- 100.0%
Sample: 2Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
7d
- Active days
- 5
- Dated share
- 100.0%
Sample: 14Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
30d
- Active days
- 22
- Dated share
- 100.0%
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Topic mixThe five categories that appear most often in the source's final articles. Same generous multi-labelling as E7.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (14 of 20)
30d
Business83%
AI76%
Cloud26%
Security25%
Data9%
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Content-type mixWhat kind of pieces the source publishes. Coarse AI labels - labelled 'AI-classified article type'.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (14 of 20)
30d
News reporting36%
Analysis36%
Announcement18%
Untyped10%
Breaking news0%
Other0%
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Tone mix and net toneThe distribution of article-level sentiment in the source's final articles, plus net tone. Official channels are self-promotional by nature.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (7 of 20)
30d
Positive61%
Mixed16%
Neutral13%
Negative9%
Net tone: Positive · 0.52
Sample: 75Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Most-covered entitiesThe top 5 linked entities in the source's final articles. Catalog gaps and disabled forms under-count.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (14 of 20)
30d
NVIDIA3%
OpenAI3%
Salesforce3%
Anthropic2%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise2%
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Regional focusWhich parts of the world this source's coverage concerns. The AI's reading of the article's geography, not the outlet's country of registration.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (5 of 10)
30d
Global 72.3% · Unspecified 2.1%
US71%
__no_region__13%
UK8%
Sample: 24Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Audiences coveredWhich audiences this source's articles say are affected. Consumers is the corpus default; read every number as a deviation from it.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (14 of 20)
30d
Enterprises80%
Others16%
Developers13%
- Enterprises+69.9pp vs baseline
- Others-2.6pp vs baseline
- Developers-1.0pp vs baseline
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Sourcing-strength mixHow often the AI judged an article's own sourcing to be strong versus thin, for this outlet's articles. The model's assessment of one article's sourcing, made without browsing. Never a publisher reliability or trust score, never used to rank sources.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (14 of 20)
30d
High76%
Medium22%
Low0%
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Confidence mixHow sure the model was about its own reading of each article. Uncalibrated self-confidence, descriptive only.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (14 of 20)
30d
Medium49%
High47%
Low1%
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Stance profileWhere the stories sit in a trend's life - accelerating, mature, or an early signal. An AI reading of the article's framing, not a market judgement.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (14 of 20)
30d
Accelerating81%
Mature11%
Early signal6%
Other0%
Sample: 94Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Event types coveredWhich kinds of events this outlet reports on. Same 2026-08-10 start date and New-Product skew as E12.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (0 of 20)
30d
Not enough data
not enough data (10 of 20)
Evidence-basis mixHow much of this outlet's coverage is built on official confirmation versus rumor, anonymous sourcing, or opinion. Correlated with the outlet's beat, never used as a trust ranking.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (12 of 20)
30d
57 rated (60.6% of coverage)
On record sources42%
Official announcement26%
Opinion26%
Analyst estimate5%
Sample: 57Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Story-phase mixWhether this outlet mostly breaks stories first or mostly follows up, reacts, and explains. Orthogonal to S5's content-type mix by prompt design.
24h
Not enough data
not offered for this window
7d
Not enough data
not enough data (12 of 20)
30d
58 rated (61.7% of coverage)
First report85%
Reaction or analysis12%
Explainer or recap3%
Sample: 58Sample size — how many underlying data points (e.g. labeled mentions, rated articles, or statements) this metric was actually computed from. Can be smaller than the entity or source's total coverage count.
Latest coverage
AIBusinessStartups
Small businesses are having their AI moment — and it's exposing a services gap
Article13h
BusinessData
IT, the business or both?
Article13h
BusinessIoTSecurity
Close the operational security gap
Article17h
AIBusiness
Balancing speed, security, and control across commercial workflows
Article19h